Is it a trade-off of safety for convenience?
Think about two cases:
1. I parked the car in my garage, locked it. I went inside with my key fob, thought the car is safe now.
However I didn't close my garage door, for whatever reason. Since my key fob in house is probably still within range, someone can just enter my garage, touch the inner side of door handle and unlock the car, and mess up with the stuff in it.
2. I parked my car in office building, locked it and walked away toward passenger side. Before I walked out of the range, someone can sneak to side of driver door, touch inner side of door handle and unlock it, and mess up with the stuff in it.
3. Not to mention RF sniffer/crackers...
4. The key fob is notoriously bigger than a simple key/remote. Not to mention the leather surface is so easy to get worn and torn.
So, any better solution? Can I have the range sensing disabled and only use buttons on key fob?
Think about two cases:
1. I parked the car in my garage, locked it. I went inside with my key fob, thought the car is safe now.
However I didn't close my garage door, for whatever reason. Since my key fob in house is probably still within range, someone can just enter my garage, touch the inner side of door handle and unlock the car, and mess up with the stuff in it.
2. I parked my car in office building, locked it and walked away toward passenger side. Before I walked out of the range, someone can sneak to side of driver door, touch inner side of door handle and unlock it, and mess up with the stuff in it.
3. Not to mention RF sniffer/crackers...
4. The key fob is notoriously bigger than a simple key/remote. Not to mention the leather surface is so easy to get worn and torn.
So, any better solution? Can I have the range sensing disabled and only use buttons on key fob?