SwedeSpeed - Volvo Performance Forum banner
1 - 3 of 25 Posts
Re: Cayenne vs XC90 (chicagoland)

Welcome to Swedespeed!

Cayenne vs. XC90, that is an interesting comparison.

It sounds like the Cayenne offers very impressive off-road features.

If I were deciding, I would be asking myself some practical questions:

1.) Am I going to use any of those off-road features or are they going to go to waste? Almost 95% of SUV buyers don't take their SUV's off-road.

2.) Does it matter that the Cayenne is almost as fast as the BMW M5 around the Nurburging? Am I planning on racing my new SUV around a track or from a stoplight?

3.) Do I need an air-suspension that has 6-different settings?

4.) Do I want to buy a base model Cayenne when I can spend almost $10k less and get a fully loaded XC90 T6?

5.) Finally, of course looks are always subjective, but IMHO the Cayenne is a disgrace and would make Dr. Ferdinand Porsche roll-over in his grave.

Is the Porsche better than the Volvo? Most likely, but it all depends on what your priorities are.

Just my 02...

-Drew
 
Re: Exterior View (chicagoland)

quote:

Any off-road pics for the XC90?
I don't think that Volvo has released any off-road pics of the XC90 yet. IIRC, Volvo actually says that the XC90 is only intended for moderate off-road duty. So, if you want an SUV with max ground clearance, rock crawling ablility, adjustable suspension, driving through a foot of mud, and going on the Rubicon trail, I would forget about the XC90 all-together, and get the Cayenne or Range Rover. The XC90 was never intended for the Rubicon.

The XC90 uses Haldex AWD. It is FWD until slip is detected, by 1/7 wheel rotation, then transfers power to the rear or where power is needed.

-Drew
 
1 - 3 of 25 Posts