Re: (blot)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>blot</b> »</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"><p>Actually, what I meant was that with a standard BSR mapping, one will not be able to squeeze the max out of the car especially with porting turbos.... so why choose that route?</TD></TR></TABLE><p>Well, I thought that as well, why I was going to drive to RICA so they could do a custom map for me, even though they are lagging on a softloader. <p>But when I saw RhaRdeRs dyno results showing that a BSR still took advantage of the DP, even though it wasn't "optimized" for it, it got me thinking. If the biggest thing the ECU tune is turn up the boost, then as long as you aren't planning on running more than 19-20 psi, you can take advantage of the softloader capabilities of BSR, or Torque Removal of others. <p>EVOLVE confirmed my belief by saying no diffrerence in results for software tuned for filter/DP/exhaust and not. <p>Now, if you are doing extensive mods, then this probably doesn't hold true. Especially if you wan't boost to go above 19-20. But I didn't think porting a turbo did much but allow it to spin up quicker, is that an "extensive" mod?<p>I would think water injection and maybe FMIC mods would benefit more from custom ECUs, but not an engineer, so I don't know.