SwedeSpeed - Volvo Performance Forum banner

I drove the B6 S4 Avant MT6... just my humble opinions.

2.2K views 13 replies 10 participants last post by  gcbarrie  
#1 ·
I don't want anyone in the Audi camp or in the Volvo camp to flame me for some of the following, I really did consider each thoroughly before buying the V70R in June. Also, for those who frequent the V70R.com forums, this was posted there a few days ago since I remembered my password there, but forgot how to log onto SS until we got back into town today.

Out of total luck, I found what was the closest match to my R at the VW/Audi/Porsche dealership in Portland that it was uncanny. So the salesman pulls the car up and I get in and as I tried to move the seat forward, there was no response from the seat. While the passenger side moved right away, the driver's seat would only move after the car had warmed up over about 15 minutes. After that, we were off.

Summary points in favor of the S4 Avant:
- Shifter feels smoother than the R
- The engine response is immediate (great pull at low rpm w/o the lag and no bogging feel)
- While published breaking distances are similar, the Audi's feel "tighter"
- Turning radius is materially better

Summary point in favor of the R wagon:
- Better price for the R is hard to ignore ($10k)
- More room front (1") and back (3")
- Instrumentation is less distracting at night
- The S4 suspension is harsh, rather like the Advanced mode, so the R is much friendlier
- Though the NAV is a bit pricier in the R, it seems a better system
- Seats are more comfortable
- Stereo is significantly better
- There is no integrated phone with the S4 as with the R
- The R is an ULEV and the S4 is LEV w/ the $1,700 guzzler tax
- Yada yada yada

I had to drive with the sales person in tow, who while friendly (eager to make a sale and under the impression that me and the wife need a second car) didn't care how hard I drove the car. We did about 10 miles with some hwy miles, some stop-and-go traffic and then (at my request) some dark rural roads. The moment I hit the gas pedal, the S4 roared and the car shook as the 4.2ltr engine is more appropriate for a farm truck than a family hauler. The car JUST GOES when you hit the accelerator and it occurred to me that this car is tuned to be a performance car, and unlike the R, does not offer an appealing ride to a very wide range of drivers.

And for everyone who gripes about the xenons on the R, the S4 lights are certainly no better. After taking the S4 out on the dark (no street lights) rural roads I then hit the very same roads with my R and I could not tell ANY difference between the two systems.

Johann has empirical data to support his case against Volvo. While I certainly wish him luck (and hope that it may benefit all current and future 04 R owners) I for one cannot say that I regret my purchase at all. However, I walked away from my short time behind the wheel of the B6 S4 Avant wishing that my R felt more like that... instant response from the engine at the lower-end of the rpm band. I only got the S4 up to 5k, but it was sweet and pulled hard the whole way there!

On paper, there is very little to differentiate the two cars, and even Audi's site (S4 Avant MT6 vs. V70R MT6) can provide very little evidence to support the price premium over the V70R, however if the R specs are in fact not 100% correct, some purchase decisions will weigh in favor of the S4 Avant. The S4 Avant was not available in June for me so who knows what a hands-on test would have done for my order. I certainly hope to see Volvo make a north-south I-6 twin-turbo in the next R, or else I may have purchased my last Volvo (for a while). At least this could improve performance and the turning radius.

Sorry for the long post. I welcome constructive comments. http://********************/smile/emthup.gif I may not sound really pro-R here, but I do love my car. I was reminded just how much I love it all the way back to NYC from Maine.
 
#2 ·
Re: I drove the B6 S4 Avant MT6... just my humble opinions. (24Hours)

I compared the two and chose the R. I would have had to order each sight unseen as they only existed on paper then. As for the engines, turbo charging is great but not a real replacement for sheer brawn. My C36 had 285 lbs of real torque at 1900 RPM's. It pulled no matter what gear you were in. 60-100 MPH was as much a rush as 0-60. I'm sure the Audi provides the same feeling plus. But, for me, the S4 looks way too similar to the A4, their screenless Navi is a joke, the interior's much smaller, and let's not forget the $10K price difference. And as much as we b!tch, at least we haven't blown engines (OK, we blew one) and transmissions. I'm sure it's a great car, and that I would have been happy with it, but there's just something about blowing away 350Z's with a turquoise Volvo wagon with an orange interior.
Image
 
#3 ·
Re: I drove the B6 S4 Avant MT6... just my humble opinions. (24Hours)

I read your post at the V70R.com forum. While I agree both posts are basically the same I was struck by a one difference. That was your descriptive reference to those that complain about the MY04 headlights missing above. I don't see how Audi's poor headlights make the Volvo's any better.

I'm confused,
Image
but not surprising from,

A Baby from the Bunch
 
#4 ·
Re: I drove the B6 S4 Avant MT6... just my humble opinions. (24Hours)

Nice decription, Don, and I wholeheartedly agree with all your points.

The Audi site does have two FALSE descriptions as far as the R is concerned. For Chrome accents, they claim that R does not have any and they also claim that the seat belts are pretensioned only up front when we know that is not true; all 5 seatbelts are pretensioned.

Yannis
 
#5 ·
Good writeup! Always nice to read an informed experience that isn't blatantly biased for either side. In terms of power though, a V8 is going to stomp all over any turbo car in the mid range if the peak HP ratings are remotely similar. That's no fault of Volvo's per se, true for any of the turbos (B5 S4, STI, Evo). No replacement for displacement.

Same thing is true for motorcycles... there's 1000 cc (or 750 cc race engines) that put out around 155hp at the rear wheel at their peak output, but my 12R puts out 75ftlb of torque by 4000rpm on the dyno, where they are lucky to peak at 75ftlb. So, if midrange is the name of the game, you need to go supercharged V8 shopping.

For me though, I want decent midrange with a nice peak output.. after all, a true sports car spends relatively little time in the low RPM's when being driven like a sports car (i.e. on the track). For me, sports car = peak output, GT car = midrange. Try an Evo sometimes... stupid fast on the track or twisty road, but you need to keep it on the boil.

I did a few trackdays on my bike this year, so I hope to get the S60R out to Thunderhill sometime next summer, see if I can beat my own track record (can't be too hard, I'm a pretty mediocre rider).

Modified by wakked1 at 8:25 PM 12-29-2003
 
#6 ·
Re: I drove the B6 S4 Avant MT6... just my humble opinions. (24Hours)

24Hours, thanx for your comments. I'm deciding between a S60R via OSD and a S4 Avant so I'm welcoming any opinions comparing the 2.
For those who care another point in Volvo's favor is the fact that Audi doesn't offer European Delivery just yet. Recently Audi of America circulated a web survey on the subject and I hope they'll offer it at some point as well.
The dreaded GG tax is another bummer for the S4 raising its already steep price. Interestingly it only affects the manual transmission and not the 6-speed tiptronic. Getting the auto box will save you $650 vs. the manual at purchase time. According to Audi the automatic equipped S4 is only 0.2 seconds slower than the manual from 0 to 62mph. If that is true it will likely be faster in the hands of average drivers like most of us are anyway.
Image

The S4's transmission and engine problems seem to involve a specific range of VINs according to owners at AudiWorld.com and several of them after a tug of war with AOA got their cars replaced by new ones. But those Audi V8s are soooo sweet…
 
#7 ·
Can't help but chime in...
The deciding factors for me were backseat leg room, ingress, egress...Also, the turbo at altitude (7000 ft), horsepower and fuel economy. Not to mention...Price.
Also, a 2.7T A4 was in front of me at a light, had no idea till he launched that he even noticed the R, at about 50 mph and 5 seconds later I blew by him at full boost.
Image
 
#8 ·
Re: I drove the B6 S4 Avant MT6... just my humble opinions. (FineProperty)

Quote, originally posted by FineProperty »
The deciding factors for me were backseat leg room, ingress, egress...Also, the turbo at altitude (7000 ft), horsepower and fuel economy. Not to mention...Price.

Rich, I agree on your points. Rear leg room is 3" less in the S4 Avant than the V70R (not sure about the sedan comparisons since the S60R is slightly smaller in the back than the V70R). I should have taken the baby-seat out of my R and put it in the S just to see the look on the salesman's face. And I still day-dream about moving back to Denver so like you, I wanted the adaptability of the turbo. However, in the end, timing and price were really my deciding factors. The R was available when the S was not. And like I said earlier: on paper (since the decision was all site-unseen) the S4 Avant just didn't make a convincing argument.

To those who may still be bouncing between the two cars for the future, do yourself a favor and go drive each. A little time behind the wheel is worth far more than words from strangers. http://********************/smile/emthup.gif

Yannis... thanks. I was just trying to be objective. Ultimately, the only way I'd be settled on the issue is by having both!
Image
 
#9 ·
For me, it seems strange to compare the S4 with the V70R. I looked at the Audi when doing my initial new-car search and crossed off the S4 (a 2003 model) without even driving it...it was simply too small inside.

The A6/S6 is a better comprison in my opinion. Yes, the Audi is nice, but it shares too many features with my wife's Passat to justify paying 60 grand. In comparison, the V70R is a no-brainer: decent interior space (including third-row seating for the kids when the grandparents come along), outstanding performance for a wagon, and a very attractive price tag!

As you might have guessed, the V70R is my car of choice. I'm currently planning for OSD in April...the wait is going to kill me!
Chris
 
#10 ·
Re: I drove the B6 S4 Avant MT6... just my humble opinions. (FineProperty)

FineProperty, there's no 2.7T A4. Maybe it was an A6, or an A4 1.8T? In any case in expert hands the R should be faster with its better power/weight ratio.
I'm looking to replace my daily driver - a '00 A4 Avant, so I'm not concerned about rear leg room and such. The A/S4 platform is smaller than the s60/V70. We have a XC90 for long trips and hauling stuff.
The price, GG tax and the lack of OSD are weighing heavily against the S4 Avant in my case. I've driven both and personally I like the dynamics of the S4 better than the R's.
 
#11 ·
Re: I drove the B6 S4 Avant MT6... just my humble opinions. (AudiPutz)

Quote, originally posted by AudiPutz »
FineProperty, there's no 2.7T...

Perhaps he was referring to the AllRoad.
Image
 
#13 ·
Re: (gcbarrie)

originally posted by gcbarrie "I looked at the Audi when doing my initial new-car search and crossed off the S4 (a 2003 model) without even driving it"

Yes I am a newbie, but I have been looking at the S4's for a while now. All that I have seen and read so far is changing my mind and now thinking of getting a S60R. Just a little info on the S4, they were made from 2000 to 2002 and then again for 04 there were actually no 03's made.