[S.R.]

<B>2003 Cadillac SRX</B><P>Yet another SUV, not to bad looking IMHO. I am sure it will sell like crazy...<P> <IMG SRC="http://www.thecarconnection.com/images/gallery/5996_image.jpg"> <P>-Drew<P>

 

[Carl Sims]

Coming soon to a music video near you... Rolling on Dubs, of course.<P> <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by InDy:<BR><B>2003 Cadillac SRX</B><P>Yet another SUV, not to bad looking IMHO. I am sure it will sell like crazy...<P> <IMG SRC="http://www.thecarconnection.com/images/gallery/5996_image.jpg"> <P>-Drew<P><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P><p>[This message has been edited by Carl Sims (edited 08-22-2002).]

 

[FMonk]

I must say that I'm not much of an SUV person, but for some reason, the front ends they've been putting on the new Cadillacs really gets me. They just seem so strange driving down the street, with their angular shape... I like it! (or at least the way that it looks... <IMG SRC="http://www.swedespeed.com/ubb/smile.gif">)<P>

 

[javadoc]

It'd sell better if marketed like this.... (get it?)<P> <IMG SRC="http://www.javadoc.net/images/5996.jpg"> <p>[This message has been edited by javadoc (edited 08-25-2002).]

 

[Kai]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by javadoc:<BR><B>It'd sell better if marketed like this.... (get it?)</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>Nope...I think that pic requires us to log in to view it.<P>

 

[Kai]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by InDy:<BR><B>2003 Cadillac SRX</B><BR>Yet another SUV, not to bad looking IMHO. I am sure it will sell like crazy...<BR><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>Get the same design treatment as the CTS? Looks good in the picture, just like CTS...when I first saw CTS in person, I thought the car was driving backwards at high speed.....didn't know that was the front end of the car.

 

[GrnEgzHam]

Do you guys have terrible taste or what? The Art and Science design theme at Caddy is shameful. It is different to be different, not to be attractive. The CTS proportions are totally wrong... the vehicle looks like its standing on its tippy toes. This vehicle looks even more ridiculous. The hard angles will NOT last even if they get trendy in the short term (see Ford's New Edge theme that was hot and cold in two years). Car design is moving to more organic, timeless shapes and not so hard edged. Where are you guys from, the Midwest? You can't be from the West Coast.... You think this looks comparable to a BMW X5, Volvo X90, VW Toureg, Lexus RX300, Acura MDX, etc. f'in etc. This is 2nd worse to the Aztek and Buick entries. And GM has the guts (with Lutz) to keep Wayne Cherry!

 

[silvereye]

well...cadillac has not always convey a sense of taste, only wealth...<BR>i think gm design (at least in US) is making all the wrong decisions

 

[GrecianVolvo]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by GrnEgzHam:<BR><B>Do you guys have terrible taste or what? The Art and Science design theme at Caddy is shameful. It is different to be different, not to be attractive. The CTS proportions are totally wrong... the vehicle looks like its standing on its tippy toes. This vehicle looks even more ridiculous. The hard angles will NOT last even if they get trendy in the short term (see Ford's New Edge theme that was hot and cold in two years). Car design is moving to more organic, timeless shapes and not so hard edged. Where are you guys from, the Midwest? You can't be from the West Coast.... You think this looks comparable to a BMW X5, Volvo X90, VW Toureg, Lexus RX300, Acura MDX, etc. f'in etc. This is 2nd worse to the Aztek and Buick entries. And GM has the guts (with Lutz) to keep Wayne Cherry!</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P><BR>I couldn't have written it better myself! Totally hideous!<P>Yannis<BR><P>