Should we buy an XC 60? I sat in one of these and it was nice but have not driven one yet. we still have a 2006 V70 2.5T. But when it is time to replace it wondering about the XC 60? Any feedback appreciated.
David
David
:thumbup:What we like about the XC60:
+Very comfortable seats
+Easy to drive
+Safe
+Great power, yet decent MPG
+Smooth, responsive, efficient engine
+Excellent highway car; we especially like the adaptive cruise control
+Enough room for 4 passengers in comfort
+Flexible cargo area
+Good looking for an SUV
+Quiet
+Good handling
+ Nice ride, except when overinflated to reset TPMS false alert.
+ Good towing capacity
+ Reliable so far
The good news is that, at least on 2015.5 models, there is a menu item for DST: the three choices are off, on, and auto. The bad news is that the auto setting doesn't work, as I learned last Sunday.What I don't like about the XC60 (see Swedespeed threads on most of them):
- Time change to EST not intuitive, took ~ 4 menu levels, should be automatic from GPS
Nice review overall, but having owned a '09 Q5 prior to XC60 (MY 15.5), I would disagree that the Audi is more refined. More feedback from the road, yes (feel every imperfection). Just a little more composed in turns. But overall, I prefer XC60 ride over Q5. As far as build quality, again, I would give the nod to the Volvo so far - well-designed, very solid and quiet cabin, no rattles or creaks, even during hard turns. IMHO both X3 and GLK are pretty ugly looking, but that is very subjective.it really depends on what you're looking for. If you're looking for a very very nice CUV, it's great. However, it's not as refined as the Q5, or X3. Then you look at the looks, it's definitely more dynamic looking than the Q5 or X3, but not as much as the GLK's front. It's definitely not as fun as the QX70 or X3.
...
I honestly found the Q5 Premium cabin to be more "tight" - for example, the door handles inside the doors - why is the underside unfinished and sharp? versus smooth all the way around? Up till this day that bugs me to no end.Nice review overall, but having owned a '09 Q5 prior to XC60 (MY 15.5), I would disagree that the Audi is more refined. More feedback from the road, yes (feel every imperfection). Just a little more composed in turns. But overall, I prefer XC60 ride over Q5. As far as build quality, again, I would give the nod to the Volvo so far - well-designed, very solid and quiet cabin, no rattles or creaks, even during hard turns. IMHO both X3 and GLK are pretty ugly looking, but that is very subjective.
I owned two BMW 3-series in a row, before I switched over to S60, and I agree that BMW interiors in general are very well made, although they do develop rattles fairly quickly in my experience. However, practicality of X4/X6 is very questionable. Also, rear window visibility is seriously compromised. I am curious what part of Audi Infotainment interface you like so much? I found it very cumbersome and non-intuitive, compared to Volvo. This is just for general car controls, not for internet browsing or anything...I honestly found the Q5 Premium cabin to be more "tight" - for example, the door handles inside the doors - why is the underside unfinished and sharp? versus smooth all the way around? Up till this day that bugs me to no end.
I think the Audi MMI does a significantly better Job than my version of Sensus.
However Volvo to Audi, the XC60 destroys the Q5 in the looks department in the front. The audi tail lights and volvo taillights are both pretty cool i think.
X3/X4 to XC60 - I find the BMW more simple, but again just feels nicer - also, having taken apart pieces of the console during Heico installation have skewed my perception of the build quality in the volvo.
I think the GLK makes a bold statement in the front, and looks like poopy in the back.
X40M was revealed and i have to say that looks VERY nice - though i am waiting to hear about the final performance numbers.
Then you have to compare other things, X4 comes with a HUD, S+S was ditched by Volvo and has to be purchased, vs BMW's included maintenance.
On the flip side, the XC60 is a Volvo, the BMW is just yet another German car - I really was a bit disappointed by the change to the face for the mid-cycle refresh - but I can't wait to see how they integrate thor's hamemr into XC60 lights.
Well that's an improvement, even without auto setting.The good news is that, at least on 2015.5 models, there is a menu item for DST: the three choices are off, on, and auto. The bad news is that the auto setting doesn't work, as I learned last Sunday.![]()
Make sure you test drive an XC70 as well as the XC60. The 60 will have a little less cargo space than your V70. The XC70 will have a little more, but also feel lower to the ground when driving like your V70 compared to the XC60.Should we buy an XC 60? I sat in one of these and it was nice but have not driven one yet. we still have a 2006 V70 2.5T. But when it is time to replace it wondering about the XC 60? Any feedback appreciated.
i felt that it was visually more enjoyable. Actually i also found the navigation portion better and easier to use. I find the Volvo navi very cumbersomeI owned two BMW 3-series in a row, before I switched over to S60, and I agree that BMW interiors in general are very well made, although they do develop rattles fairly quickly in my experience. However, practicality of X4/X6 is very questionable. Also, rear window visibility is seriously compromised. I am curious what part of Audi Infotainment interface you like so much? I found it very cumbersome and non-intuitive, compared to Volvo. This is just for general car controls, not for internet browsing or anything...
+1 I was looking for a wagon so I started with the XC-70 but there were no P* modded ones so I drove the XC-60 RD to sample it. Very nice overall but there was something about sitting lower to the ground and having that extra space that I really liked. Still thrilled every time I even look at my XC-70. This coming from a Subaru Legacy GT guy who wasn't even looking at Volvos till a friend mentioned the P* option. Wagon + P* =Make sure you test drive an XC70 as well as the XC60. The 60 will have a little less cargo space than your V70. The XC70 will have a little more, but also feel lower to the ground when driving like your V70 compared to the XC60.
Not sure when it became available, but there is nowThere is no heated steering wheel, but the car warms up terrifically quickly via remote start (or the app for new models)
+1Otherwise, best bang for the buck
We are very happy with ours also, two weeks in. Mileage started off pretty crappy (barely 17mpg combined, T6 AWD), but I am sure it will improve with time - we only have 500 miles on the clock so farI am really happy with our decision to buy an XC60. It really does look beautiful - very well proportioned; interior space is great, feels very safe; the technology safety features are impressive. One of the folks talked about the pick up. We got the T6 with Polestar (330 hp) and if you put this in Sports mode and floor it, the car's acceleration even scared the crap out of my friend, the owner of the dealership. Don't think he ever drove that particular set-up. I'm also pleased with the 20 inch Titania wheels which look incredible and the ride is tactile but not at all harsh. For the price, I don't think you can do better, and I've owned most competitors.